You can see all my editing steps in the history window, left to the image preview. When done, the picture looked like this: Edited to taste in RAW Therapee. There’s also a graduated grey filter that you can apply, and I did, to brighten up the foreground and darken the sky a bit. I tried a different approach and just started to tweak with all the controls by myself. You can also download and install several other profiles from the internet. Here’s an example, the profile “Punchy 2”: RAW Therapee processing profile “Punchy 2”. What you can do is try the various processing profiles. So you see, if you start working with RAW Therapee, you’d rather be liberal with all the adjustments regarding contrast, saturation, and the like. The camera was set to Fuji Velvia film simulation and white balance on “cloudy”: Cologne autumn colors. Only resized for the blog, otherwise untouched. What the heck did I snap there? This is the JPG out of camera. Then it looks like this: Fuji file in RAW Therapee, everything reset to zero. Pretty dull, eh? Notice that the program applied “auto levels” on import. For most cameras, you also get that choice when working with Lightroom or other converters – but for some cameras, especially Micro Four Thirds, you don’t have that choice! (Why care? Read here why for example automatic distortion control can be even a disadvantage in certain situations.)īut when I opened the first Fuji X-E3 file with RAW Therapee, I was in for a shock :) It looked like this: Fuji file in RAW Therapee, auto levels. The second good thing is, you have all the freedom to add vignetting or distortion corrections by yourself. Even from new cameras that were not on sale when the current software version was released. The first good thing is that RAW Therapee will read about any data. are not recognised or processed by RAW Therapee! ![]() All the information that the manufacturer adds to that data, all the lens correction profiles regarding distortion, chromatic abberation, etc. What I personally like – buy maybe many others might find annoying – is that RAW Therapee just treats the RAW file as what it is: RAW data from a camera sensor. ![]() (Feel free to give me feedback if you know something better than me!) I am still far from a RAW Therapee expert. If you – like me – come from Adobe Lightroom, you’ll still have to adjust a lot cause it works differently. RAW Therapee is a really powerful imaging software. If you’re not cropping, printing really large, or are using a 5k screen, they offer all the detail you’ll normally need, and for really high-end applications you’ll want to use the RAW anyway. These size M JPGs look actually pretty nice. But my camera is set to record RAW (lossless compressed) plus a size M JPG (with the X-E3, size L is 24, M is 12, and S is 6 Megapixels). Again, I am not the biggest fan of the way how really fine details are rendered in-camera. RAW and JPGĭepending on the situation, I also actually like the way my Fuji X-E3 renders JPG files in-camera. Apart from that we all like open-source software (and I still remember how Adobe Lightroom started as a free software called RAW Shooter Essentials), RAW Therapee is also said to be very good in extracting fine detail from Fuji’s RAW files. As of the date this post was published, this is a free open-source RAW converter that offers you all the bells and whistles of any other big RAW converter. Or whatever …Īnyway, there are two really interesting alternatives, one being the Iridient X-Transformer, and the other is RAW Therapee. ![]() Or due to the Adobe team giving a fuck about the peculiarities of Fuji’s X-Trans sensor. The reason being that it does not render fine details that nice, due to the peculiarities of Fuji’s X-Trans sensor. Since I have the Fuji X-E3, I don’t use Lightroom anymore as my main RAW converter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |